Publications

BACKGROUND

Historically, older patients with ulcerative colitis were not considered candidates for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. However, more recent evidence suggests that this procedure can be performed in older patients with acceptable surgical and functional results.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to determine whether older age is independently associated with surgical procedure type among patients with ulcerative colitis in a large national database.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional analysis of ulcerative colitis patients undergoing end ileostomy or IPAA, grouped by age.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent total proctocolectomy or completion proctectomy with either IPAA or end ileostomy from 2005 to 2012 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database were included in this study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was procedure type (end ileostomy or IPAA). Patient factors associated with procedure type, including age and trends over time, were examined using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 3635 patients with ulcerative colitis, 28.2% underwent end ileostomy and 71.8% underwent IPAA. Older patients were more likely to undergo end ileostomy than patients ≤50 years of age after adjustment for sex, smoking, BMI, frailty trait count, and ASA class (p < 0.001). The odds of end ileostomy decreased by 12% per year between 2005 and 2012 in patients aged 61 to 70 years compared with patients ≤50 years of age (adjusted OR, 0.88 per year; p = 0.021).

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to analyze other potentially important determinants of procedure type, such as surgeon, patient preference, and anal sphincter integrity.

CONCLUSIONS

Age remains strongly associated with procedure type. The use of end ileostomy, however, is decreasing over time in patients 61 to 70 years of age as evidence accumulates that IPAA is an acceptable option for older patients with ulcerative colitis (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A191).

IMPORTANCE

Regulatory limits on consumer cost sharing permit wide variation in the prices charged for screening and diagnostic tests such as colonoscopy. Employers are experimenting with reference payment initiatives that offer full insurance coverage at low-priced facilities but require substantial cost sharing if patients select high-priced alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the effect of reference payment on facility choice, insurer spending, consumer cost sharing, and procedural complications for colonoscopy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) implemented reference payment in January 2012. We obtained data on 21 644 CalPERS enrollees who underwent colonoscopy in the 3 years prior to implementation and on 13 551 patients in the 2 years after implementation. Control group data were obtained on 258 616 Anthem Blue Cross enrollees who underwent colonoscopy and who were not subject to reference payment initiatives during this 5-year period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Consumer choice of facility, price paid per procedure, total insurer spending, consumer cost sharing, and procedural complications.

EXPOSURES

Choices, prices, and complications were compared for CalPERS and Anthem patients before and after implementation of reference payments, using difference-in-difference multivariable regressions to adjust for patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities, procedure indications, and geographic location.

RESULTS

Utilization of low-priced facilities for CalPERS members increased from 68.6% in 2009 to 90.5% in 2013. After adjusting for patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and other factors, the implementation of reference payment increased use of low-priced facilities by 17.6 percentage points (95% CI, 11.8 to 23.4; P < .001). The mean price paid for colonoscopy for the CalPERS population increased from $1587 (95% CI, $1555-$1618) in 2009 to $1716 (95% CI, $1678-$1753) in 2011 and then decreased to $1508 (95% CI, $1469-$1548) in 2013 for patients subject to reference payment. After adjustment for other relevant factors, reference payment was responsible for a 21.0% (95% CI, -26.0% to -15.6%, P < .001) reduction in the price. Reference payment was associated with a small but statistically insignificant decline in procedural complications, from 2.1% in 2009 to 2.0% in 2013 (P = .47). In the first 2 years after implementation, CalPERS saved $7.0 million (28%) on spending for the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Implementation of reference payment for colonoscopy was associated with reduced spending and no change in complications.

BACKGROUND

Although social support is important for quality of life in patients undergoing surgery for ulcerative colitis, the impact of surgery on patient relationships is not known.

OBJECTIVE

We examined relationship parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis and their partners before and 6 months after surgery.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort in which we performed an exploratory analysis.

SETTINGS

Patients were enrolled from an academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Surgical patients with ulcerative colitis and their partners were invited to participate.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent proctocolectomy in 1, 2, or 3 stages.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured quality of life and sexual function in patients, as well as relationship quality, empathy, and sexual satisfaction in patients and partners before and 6 months after surgery using validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

The study sample consisted of 74 participants, including 37 patients (25 men and 12 women) and their opposite-sex partners. Quality of life improved significantly in male and female patients after surgery. Sexual function scores also improved after surgery in male and female patients; however, the changes reached statistical significance in male patients only. Sexual satisfaction scores improved significantly after surgery in female patients and their partners. There was little change in relationship quality or empathy after surgery, with the exception of slightly improved relationship quality reported by male partners. In general, patients and partners reported levels of relationship quality and empathy similar to normative populations.

LIMITATIONS

This study included a small, highly selected sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Male and female patients with ulcerative colitis have high-quality relationships that are not negatively affected by surgical treatment. Changes in sexual function do not necessarily coincide with changes in sexual satisfaction in this patient population. Future studies should evaluate the effect of high-quality relationships on surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of frailty, a measure of diminished physiological reserve, with both major and minor surgical complications among patients undergoing urological surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2007 to 2013, we identified all urological cases that appeared > 1000 times in the dataset among patients aged ≥40 years. Frailty was measured using the NSQIP frailty index (FI), a validated measure that includes 11 impairments, such as decreased functional status and impaired sensorium. We created multivariable logistic regression models using the NSQIP FI to assess major and minor complications after surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 95 108 urological cases representing 21 urological procedures. The average frequency of complications per individual was 11.7%, with the most common complications being hospital readmission (6.2%), blood transfusion (4.6%) and urinary tract infection (3.1%). Major and minor complications increased with increasing NSQIP FI. Frailty remained strongly associated with complications after adjustment for year, age, race, smoking status and method of anaesthesia (adjusted odds ratio 1.74 [95% confidence interval 1.64, 1.85] for an NSQIP FI ≥0.18). Increasing NSQIP FI was associated with increasing frequency of complications within age groups (by decade) up to age 81 years and across most procedures.

CONCLUSION

Frailty strongly correlates with risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing urological surgery. This finding is true within most age groups and across most urological procedures.

BACKGROUND

As the population ages, an increasing number of older patients are undergoing major surgery. We examined the impact of advanced age on outcomes following major gastrointestinal cancer surgery in an era of improved surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We evaluated patients undergoing major abdominal gastrointestinal cancer surgery from 2005-2012. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the independent effect of advanced age on outcomes. Our primary outcome was 30-d mortality, and our secondary outcomes were 30-d major postoperative adverse events, discharge disposition, length of stay, reoperation, and readmission.

RESULTS

Elderly (≥65 y) patients were twice as likely to have multiple comorbidities as those <65 y but prevalence of comorbidities was similar across all older age groups. Mortality increased with age across all procedures (P < 0.05). The risk of advanced age on mortality was highest in hepatectomy (odds ratio = 5.17, 95% confidence interval = 2.19-12.20) and that for major postoperative adverse events was highest in proctectomy (odds ratio = 2.32, 95% confidence interval = 1.53-3.52). Patients were more likely to be discharged to an institutional care facility as age increased across all procedures (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being highly selected for surgery, elderly patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery have substantially worse postoperative outcomes than younger patients (<65 y). The risk of age on postoperative outcomes was present across all operations but had its highest association with liver and rectal cancer resections.

As the world's aging population grows, the surgical population is increasingly made up of older adults. Due to changes in physiologic function and increasing comorbidity burden, older adults are at increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and functional decline after surgery. In addition, decision to undergo surgery for the older adult may be based on the postoperative functional outcome rather than survival. Although few studies have evaluated an older adult's function as a postoperative outcome, surgeons are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of maintaining or regaining function in an older patient. Interventions to improve postoperative functional outcomes are being developed and show promising results. This review discusses existing literature on postoperative functional outcomes in older adults and recently developed interventions.

BACKGROUND

Up to 30% of patients who have ulcerative colitis are faced with the complex decision between end ileostomy and IPAA. We developed a decision aid to encourage shared decision making between patients and surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine whether a decision aid is effective and acceptable for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis and their treating surgeons.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Patients and surgeons were enrolled from 3 colorectal surgery clinics.

PATIENTS

Consecutive adult patients with ulcerative colitis who were candidates for IPAA and end ileostomy were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients used a multilingual decision aid before meeting with the surgeon.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured changes in knowledge, treatment preference, and stage of decision making, as well as preparation for decision making, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction after using the decision aid.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled; 5 had previously undergone subtotal colectomy. After using the decision aid, patients' knowledge scores improved by 39% (p < 0.006), 6 patients changed their treatment preference, and 8 reported increased certainty in treatment preference. The median for preparation for decision making was 75 of 100. Patient satisfaction with the decision aid (median score, 37/41) and surgeon satisfaction with the clinical encounter (median score, 38/45) were high. Patients who previously underwent subtotal colectomy had lower preparation for decision-making scores (median score, 58 vs 78 for surgery-naïve patients, p = 0.06), and did not report increased certainty in treatment preference after using the decision aid.

LIMITATIONS

The study included a small sample with no comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel decision aid for surgical patients with ulcerative colitis appears to be effective and acceptable in patients and surgeons from diverse clinical settings. Patients who have not yet initiated surgical treatment seem to benefit most. Future studies to validate the knowledge questionnaire and test the decision aid in a randomized fashion are warranted.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between frailty and postoperative discharge destination after different types of commonly performed urologic procedures in older patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) from 2011 to 2013, we identified commonly performed inpatient urologic procedures among patients aged 65 and older. We then assessed the effect of frailty, measured by the NSQIP Frailty Index (NSQIP-FI), on discharge to a skilled or assisted living facility using logistic regression and assessed the heterogeneity of this effect across procedures using 2-level random effects modeling.

RESULTS

Overall, 1144 out of 20,794 (5.5%) urologic cases, representing 19 different procedures, resulted in discharge to a skilled or assisted living facility. Cystectomy and large transurethral resection of bladder tumor had the highest percentage (16.3%). Twenty-five percent of patients undergoing urology procedures were frail (NSQIP-FI 0.18+), including 9.8% of patients discharged to a facility. Even after adjustment for year, age, race, type of anesthesia, smoking status, recent weight loss, and whether or not the procedure was elective, frailty was strongly associated with discharge to a facility (adjusted odds ratio 3.1 [96% confidence interval 2.5, 3.8] for NSQIP-FI 0.18+ compared to NSQIP FI 0). This finding was consistent across most procedures of varying complexity with an overall effect of odds ratio 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.5, 2.0).

CONCLUSION

Increasing frailty is associated with discharge to a skilled or assisted living facility across most inpatient urologic procedures evaluated, regardless of complexity. This information is important for preoperative counseling with patients undergoing urologic surgery.